Hubble Diagram | ||

A simple diagram | ||

Distances | ||

Redshifts | ||

- Measuring | ||

- Interpreting | ||

- Sample | ||

Conclusion | ||

Your Diagrams |

## RedshiftsIn Section I, you used SkyServer to look up redshifts of twelve galaxies. In this section, you will learn how to calculate redshifts for yourself. If any of the following words or concepts are not familiar to you, read about them in any introductory physics or astronomy text before you begin this section: spectrum, spectra Astronomers learn an amazing number of things from the analyzing the spectra of stars, galaxies, and quasars. In this section, we will focus on just one application: we will learn how to measure the redshift of a galaxy from its spectrum, and we will learn how to interpret and use this number.
## Measuring RedshiftsMeasuring a redshift or blueshift requires four steps: 1) obtain the spectrum of something (let's say a
galaxy) that shows spectral lines An example will help to show how this works. Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe, and it is often seen in galaxies where gas becomes ionized and fluoresces. The spectrum of such a region shows a pattern called the Balmer series of lines in emission. The Balmer lines for emission are easy to reproduce in a classroom with a hydrogen discharge tube. The energizing agent that makes the gas glow is not the same as in galaxies, but the spectrum - the pattern of lines - is the same. Either from your own measurements in the classroom, or from pre-tabulated information, the rest wavelengths of the Balmer lines are as follows:
The redshift, symbolized by z, is defined as: 1 + z = l
For example, taking the Balmer gamma line, 1 + z = 4780 / 4340.5 = 1.1, so z = 0.1. Note that if the observed
wavelength were less than the rest wavelength, the value of z would be
negative - that would tell us that we have a blueshift, and the galaxy is
approaching us. It turns out that almost every galaxy in the sky has
a redshift in its spectrum. Choosing the alpha, beta, or delta lines would also yield z = 0.1 - the measured redshift does not depend on which line you choose. If this statement is found not to be true (within the errors of measurement, of course), then most likely you have not made the correct identification of at least one of the lines.
## Interpreting RedshiftsYou have just directly computed the redshift for a galaxy. The quantity z is dimensionless, and since it is derived directly from data, its value is unambiguous. We will often use just this number. However, sometimes we want to express the result as the velocity of the galaxy with respect to us, in units of km/sec. Converting from redshift z to velocity v measured in km/sec is easy - the formula is v = c z , where Thus, in this example, galaxy 582102012537667624 appears to be moving
away from us at 0.1 x 3 x 10 Since the formula is equivalent to z = v / c, it contains an interpretation of the meaning of the value of z: z measures the galaxy's speed of recession relative to the speed of light. Up to this point things are straightforward, but there are two important qualifications. First, the formula v = c z is accurate only when z is small compared to 1.0 (0.1 would be OK in this sense). For high velocities, those that approach the speed of light, a more complicated formula is needed to derive an accurate velocity v from the measured redshift z. Second, while we often speak of the "recession of galaxies," which implies motion through space, in fact the expanding universe picture is that space itself is expanding: the galaxies are not moving through space, but just being carried along by space as it expands (see The Hubble Diagram for more about this concept). In this picture, the redshift of a galaxy is not supposed to be interpreted as a velocity at all, even though the observed redshift looks just like a Doppler shift. Rather, in this cosmological context, the redshift tells us the relative scale of the universe at the time the light left the galaxy. Suppose the distance to galaxy 582102012537667624 was d(z) at the time the light that we are now observing left it (to give some perspective, for z = 0.1, this time was roughly a billion years ago). In those billion years, the space in the universe has expanded, so that now the separation between our galaxy and galaxy 582102012537667624 is d(0). Then 1 + z = d(0) / d(z) . We interpret this formula as follows: at the time corresponding to redshift z = 1, all galaxies were 10% closer together. We can also say that the universe has stretched by the same factor as have the wavelengths. A measured value of z = 0.2 corresponds to a time when galaxies were 20% closer together than they are now, and so on.
Read this section only if you want to dig deeper into the interpretation of z. You can skip directly to Exercise 15 if you wish. There are really two kinds of redshifts, each with its own interpretation. Some redshifts are dynamic - they arise from moving objects (for example, two stars in orbit around each other); other redshifts arise from the cosmological expansion of space described above. If you are observing stars, the Doppler interpretation of redshift is completely adequate. You will also rarely need to worry about the accuracy of the formula v = c z because v is almost always small compared to c. Galaxies also have dynamic motions with respect to their neighbors - binary galaxies orbit one another, and galaxies have more complicated orbits within groups and clusters. Single galaxies can feel the gravitational tug of neighboring masses, and can move through space as a result of the gravity. All these velocities are also much smaller than the speed of light, and you can use v = c z. Once again, in cases of galactic motion, the Doppler interpretation is OK. In the cosmological application, we assume that the random motions of galaxies cancel to zero in some volume. When we say something like: "the redshift of the galaxy reflects the expansion of space," we are assuming that the galaxy is at rest with respect to this volume; that is, the redshift arises only from the cosmological expansion of space. In reality, though, the redshift of any galaxy will have two components: a dynamic component and a cosmological component. However, from Earth we can measure only a single number, the redshift z. Without external arguments, we cannot distinguish the two types of redshifts. As a general rule, for nearby galaxies (z < 0.001), the cosmological component is small: the dynamic part prevails and we can think in terms of Doppler shifts (objects moving through space). For relatively distant galaxies (z > 0.01), the dynamic part is smaller than the cosmological part, and thinking in terms of Doppler shift velocities could be misleading. At intermediate redshifts, z ~ 0.003, the two contributions to the measured redshift can be comparable in size. In this case, sorting out what is what is a challenge even to experts.
## Redshifts of Sample Galaxies
Now that you know what redshift is and how to measure it, you are ready to return to the sample galaxies in the three clusters from the last section.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||